Dr king’s defend against the charge of extremism Interesting Essay Topic Ideas

The Unjust

0 0
997 words
3 pages

The Ideology of Pakistan

0 0
81594 words
296 pages

Political Islam in Europe and the Mediterranean

0 0
29112 words
105 pages

The Royal Family, the Minister’s Office and the Media

0 0
10607 words
38 pages

Via Sapientiae: The Institutional Repository

0 0
63878 words
232 pages

The political philosophy of Hobbes and Locke

0 0
5426 words
19 pages

This essay compares and contrasts the political philosophy of Hobbes and Locke

0 0
5442 words
19 pages

Leadership in the African American Community

0 0
2576 words
9 pages

Settling the Northern Colonies Vocabulary

0 0
1920 words
6 pages

Case1 : King v.BioChem Therapeutic Inc

0 0
3483 words
12 pages

Anti-Semitism in the West from Constantine

0 0
5134 words
18 pages

The failure of the Schlieffen Plan – Stalemate

0 0
3598 words
13 pages

The French Reign of Terror

0 0
2696 words
9 pages

Against Anti – Social Activities

0 0
5835 words
21 pages

Barabas’ Role in the Jew of Malta

0 0
1914 words
6 pages

The Life and History of Aristotle

0 0
5472 words
19 pages

Why Is the Soft Drink Industry so Profitable?

0 0
3343 words
12 pages

The History of the “Jim Crow” System

0 0
4068 words
14 pages

Hippies and the Revolution of a Culture

0 0
3053 words
11 pages

History of Christianity in India

0 0
26939 words
97 pages

Dr Martin Luther King Jr. is widely remembered today as a leader of the civil rights movement in the United States. He was often seen as an extremely passionate advocate of peaceful protest and change, but he was still sometimes accused of being an extremist in his views and actions. In response to such charges, King defended his views and actions adamantly and eloquently, doing his best to explain the need for the civil rights movement and the need to address social injustice. When faced with the charge of extremism, King argued that the civil rights movement was becoming ever more necessary as the years progressed. He explained in his speeches and writings that the movement was about more than just basic rights for African Americans, but about the need to completely overhaul the oppressive racial structure that the U.S. was built on. He argued that this was necessary in order to achieve true justice and equality, and that it could only be accomplished through a revolution of values and laws. He felt that it was the moral responsibility of all people of conscience to make sure that these changes were made, and that there was no other way to achieve justice and equality. King also argued that nonviolence was the only way to make sure that the changes achieved by the civil rights movement would last. He firmly believed that violence and chaos would only destroy the progress made by the movement, and that the only way to enact lasting change was through peaceful protest, dialogue, and understanding. He emphasized that not only was this the most effective way to create progress, but also the most moral and just way. Finally, King argued that extremism was a necessary part of the civil rights movement because it represented the urgency and desperation of the situation faced by African Americans. He argued that the civil rights movement was a movement of extremes, and that the only way to create lasting social change was to push the boundaries of what was deemed acceptable and break down the existing oppressive structures. He stressed the importance of going to extreme lengths in order to create the necessary level of social change, and to do whatever it took to promote justice and equality. The five best examples of this charge of extremism against Dr. King include: 1. His call for a revolution of values and laws to overhaul the oppressive racial structure of the United States. 2. His insistence that nonviolence was the only way to achieve lasting change. 3. His suggestion that a movement of extremes was necessary in order to create the necessary level of social change. 4. His advocacy of civil disobedience and protest to create awareness and pressure on government and society. 5. His advocacy of the use of economic boycotts to target oppressive businesses and institutions.